AoS #1: Enemies of Classical Music Open a New Front

Articles of Shame

At least once per month, I see an article about music that makes me think: How do people get away with writing this stuff? This series, “Articles of Shame”, is dedicated to roasting bad music articles/ideas with simple common sense. The first article on the chopping block is “The Enemies of Classical Music Open a New Front” by George Leef. His article heavily quotes another opinion-heavy article by someone named Joshua Nichols, who I will probably roast next.

Here’s the link: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-enemies-of-classical-music-open-a-new-front/

In some ways I feel it is unfair to criticize George Leef for this article. Leef has used such bulky quotes, less than half the material is his own original thoughts. It is essentially soft/lazy plagiarism. Leef has many conservative ideas about music and life in general. He wrote a fantasy novel called, “The Awakening of Jennifer Van Arsdale: A Political Fable For Our Time” , in which a fictional “progressive journalist” is saved by a “black veteran with an illegal gun”, causing her to rethink her liberal ways.

The truth is there are many bad ideas about music out there. Almost everyone’s got one regardless of their political party. Anyways, Leef and Nichols are upset because the League of American Orchestras (LAO) released a new guide for choosing music that promotes “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” in orchestra concerts. Throughout the article, Leef is unable to name any specific idea or sentence in the guide.

An Argument Made of Straw

Nichols’ entire argument rests on a strawman. His goal is to make the LAO’s guide sound like a list of extreme, mandatory rules. It is easy to do with the unfortunate wordings like “equity mandate” that LAO uses. But there is no punishment for orchestras who do not follow the guidelines. Instead, there is just a little bonus fund for participants. So far it has been awarded to only 20 out of the 1711 orchestras nationwide (causeiq.com).

The LAO’s guide is just that: a guide. A guide that will be interpreted and executed many different ways by many different orchestras, slightly influencing which songs they choose play. They do not specifically mention the elimination of “merit” when choosing music or musicians as Nichols’ suggests. In fact, several of the articles are just biographies and opinions of employees in the LAO program, not actual guidance. I’ll dig into this more in the Nichol’s rebuttal on the next Articles of Shame.

Turning over a new Leef

Leef truly has only 2 original sentences of substance in this entire article, so it will be easy to dissect. He goes on this tangent: “…the ‘progressives’ want to ditch blind auditions in favor of hiring musicians based on race…” This is a cheap jab at a complicated issue. Let’s pretend you’re a judge for a music audition. You have to listen to 20 violinists all play the same song, one at a time, and you have to pick the best violinist for your orchestra. If you can see them, their appearance may influence your decision. If you cannot see them, you may mistake what sounds are familiar for what sounds are good. (Say, if you had a one-armed violinist with a prosthetic bowing appendage in your audition, like Manami Ito, their tone may be different but they may still be a great orchestra member.)

The problem is, you cannot avoid choosing one: to look or not to look. People on the left and right side of American politics both have a favorite option they root for. The truth is that perfecting the audition process is likely an impossible task. Any option will have pros and cons. We humans all helplessly judge with our own personal tastes, and the behavior of music students is very difficult to predict. The top notch auditionee you think sounds perfect might end up dropping out in 6 months, then what?

Leef’s second questionable sentence says, “…it’s very easy to stay home and listen to works you know you’ll enjoy and save the expense of going to a concert where some of the programmed pieces won’t have much appeal.” This mentality is passive aggressive and anti-intellectual. Orchestras are not big fancy iPods that let you pick every single thing that is played. They are supposed to educate and challenge their listeners sometimes, they are not purely for entertainment.

Orchestras around the world are giving in to Leef’s bad attitude, which is shared by many. These same orchestras are unintentionally creating an audience of cranky, curmudgeonly bullies. If we want audiences who are thoughtful, who have open ears and hearts, we must intentionally craft that kind of audience. If you’re going to threaten to withhold your money because an orchestra might play a song you don’t like, then orchestra concerts are not for you. Through their own shortsightedness, George Leef and Joshua Nichols have become the very thing they are afraid of: enemies of classical music.

Conclusion

Many of these issues go much deeper than one can in a single blog post. I could say so much more about Leef’s anti-intellectual writing and readers. It is an undeniable fact that some great music has been kept hidden away throughout history. How we bring that music back from the grave is an issue that effects us all, and it takes practice to lift up these underrepresented voices effectively. It is not a right/left issue, and yet each side has some favorite arguments. I’m sure I will elaborate on many of these subjects in the comments and on future Articles of Shame with you, my dedicated readers!



How to Avoid “Teacher Burn-Out”

You ask, I answer! This question is from a good friend/colleague of mine whose primary instrument is piano. He asks: “How do you recharge and not get burnt out from teaching?”

My two immediate reactions are: 1. Everyone gets burnout sometimes, and it can be for any reason and 2. the best strategy for eliminating burnout is prevention. This can involve that “recharge” phase, which itself has a couple of meanings. You can have a daily or weekly recharge regimen, as well as an extended/continuous recharge period that is needed after burnout occurs. Everyone is different and so the answer is a bit different for everyone, but here is my opinion.

You should take measures to prevent burnout. Here’s some proactive points to consider:
– Aim to not work for more than 4-6 hours straight without any scheduled breaks.
– Invest emotionally in your students. Spend a few minutes to talk with them and listen about their week, their time at school/work, etc.
– Mix up the kind of material you teach with. I have trouble maintaining interest/focus if every student is more or less on the same part of the same book. It’s so boring! I ask the students for their favorite songs and adapting to teach those instead provides me with a challenge that I enjoy.
– Don’t schedule work 7 days a week. Very easy to do as a musician, work hours per day can be limited so it doesn’t feel like a big deal to schedule yourself a 3-4 hour teaching block every single day. You need at least one day totally to yourself, because you need time to go to that friendly hangout, or the DMV, or a wedding, funeral, bar mitzvah, gig, etc. You need time to enjoy personal hobbies that will allow you to recharge a bit each week, like meditation, reading a book, exercise, karate, watching TV, playing videogames, etc.
– Make your teaching space comfortable for you, have a snack or a coffee on the desk, have a comfortable seat.
– Do not answer phone calls or texts during certain especially late or early times, or on specific off days you have planned in advance. For example: I do not handle any scheduling requests or teaching related inquiries on Saturdays. I tell everyone this, but they will still reach out anyways. I can make exceptions if I feel I have to, but scheduling is working and you deserve one day to yourself. You are not a doctor, there is no reason for you to be “on call”.
– Limit or ban make up lessons, and if possible remove uncommitted students. These can greatly complicate your schedule and become frustrations. Don’t martyr yourself for uncommitted students.

The bad news is, once burnout has taken hold of you, you can’t shake it right away. You need to fall back on these strategies and stick to them, or schedule a vacation/time off to eliminate it. I have seen many colleagues with an endless list of things to do, just chasing away at it because once the list is done they can rest. The truth is this will never bring rest, only an eternal burnout. Your list of things to do will always grow, frankly until you are either dead or at least retired. You will experience a better quality of work and of life if you stick to these burnout preventing strategies! Take care of yourselves and thank you for reading!

My Child Won’t Practice Guitar (How can I help as a parent/guardian?)

I teach plucked strings for all ages, and I get lots of questions from parents about how they can help when their child won’t practice. It’s a complicated question, different children have different needs. Age, experience level, genre, mental/physical disabilities, and much more all influence what kind of practice a child needs. Much like babies do not understand object permanence, children younger than 10 may not even understand practice. They will require regular support from a parent/guardian.

The important thing is you are here as a parent reading this article, and so you have already begun supporting your musical child, even though this may be your first music lesson experience too! After you read this blog post, I hope you’ll have some tools that will help you help your kiddos! First, let’s start with some of “don’ts”:

1. Don’t threaten to take away lessons. Negative reinforcement will not help a child learn to play an instrument. This means that punishments like grounding, spanking, or taking away lessons are useless tools in the music world. Lessons are not a fun luxury like ice cream and video games, they are enriching and educational. If a kid acts up in school, you can’t punish them by saying, “no more school!” If anything, they might need more school and more enrichment programs to support their proper growth. They need serious structure, but in a positive way.

2. Don’t put your hands on your child’s hands when they are playing their instrument. Kids are funny creatures, and it’s easy to accidentally teach them something incorrect. By putting your hands on the instrument,  you may inadvertently train your child to correct her hands with her own hands. Yes, this is as confusing as it sounds. Kids may also begin to copy your “technique” instead of their teacher’s technique. Sometimes, they’ll make mistakes nonstop, for the whoooole lesson. It makes you, the parent, feel like you’ve got to do something to help. But this is a natural part of the learning process, and your child is doing just fine. 😀

3. Do not restrict practice hours. Children should be able to practice as they please. Some like to practice more in the mornings, some more in the afternoon, some at night. This is normal, and by restricting practice such that your child cannot play in the evening, they may simply stop practicing altogether. Most of you reading this are parents of kids with plucked strings: at least it’s not a trumpet or a drum set. If you have an electric guitar and an amp at home, you can purchase headphones that plug into your amp.

If you’ve made it this far, you’re probably thinking “What can I do”. Here’s some things you CAN and absolutely should do. Some of these things will simply help your child practice more, and some things will boost motivation and deepen the relationship you both have to music, and to their instrument.

1. Help with practice time. Practice needs to occur at least 4 times a week, preferably 6-7 days a week. But a 5 year old will not be able to practice as long as a 15 year old. Remind your child to practice but also to take breaks every 30 minutes. Take breaks every 8-15 minutes for really little kids. Also, no student should be practicing a single exercise or song for a whole day. Each day, students should have multiple exercises/songs to work on, to keep things fresh.

2. Setting up the environment. Piano kids have the easiest time with this part. The instrument comes with the perfect seat and music stand! Guitar and other plucked strings are more complicated. Your child should have access to an armless chair. Young students age 10 or lower will benefit from a smaller seat, around 14 inches in height. They should have a music stand or desk where they can put their music (or camera for online lessons). You may also need to tune their instrument for them regularly, and you can ask your child’s teacher to teach you this if your child is too young to tune themselves.

3. Listen to music. It’s one of the easiest but most overlooked steps. It’s a great way to increase practice motivation and self esteem in students. First, you can ask your teacher for some awe-inspiring guitarists to listen to. This will give your kid something truly great they can aspire towards. Second, you can just listen to random music that they like. Ask them “on a scale from 1-10, how much do you like like this song?” This will make the student ask themselves, what do I like? Even if it’s unrelated to the instrument/style they are learning, that’s ok. It’s about self discovery!

4. Ask the teacher about short term/long term goals. Some students have simple short term goals, like not sticking out your pinky finger while plucking or strumming. Relaxing the shoulders. Some students will also have long term goals like playing for a concert, recital, competition, or family gathering. As the parent you should know these short and long term goals. Even saying them aloud to your child will remind them about things they forgot during the lesson, and will make their practice super efficient!

Teaching someone to play an instrument is a lot like planting and raising a tree. You can only set up a proper environment and regularly water them, but you can’t do the growing part. The same is true of students. We give them a proper environment, regular reminders, and music to listen to. We bring these factors to the highest quality, in part by communicating with the teacher. Then it’s up to the student.

“You cannot accelerate the growth of a tree by pulling its branches” – Ricardo Iznaola, On Practicing

Bach Worship, Competition Culture, and the Decline of Classical Music

Classical music is a dying art form. As the pandemic rages across the country, classical music is in a stage of hibernation. Many classical guitarists are beefing up their social media, hoping it helps them return to the concert scene when large public gatherings are permitted again. But social media doesn’t make money for most classical guitarists: it costs money. The bigger the artist or organization, the more money they throw around to drown out competing musicians. This is not a lament about how “big money” influences music. Social media alone cannot give classical music the exposure that it desires and deserves. We as classical guitarists and musicians must change our behavior in order to create the change in classical music (and the music scene as a whole) that we seek. Classical music is not dying in a vacuum; As it dies, the niche classical guitar will be one of the first to die with it. There are many interrelated factors surrounding the death of classical music, and I want to talk about 2 complex and strange phenomena in the classical guitar world that I believe have simple solutions: an unhealthy obsession with Johann Sebastian Bach and Competition culture.

Bach Worship
“I believe in Bach, the Father, Beethoven, the Son, and Brahms, the Holy Ghost of music.” — Hans von Bülow (1830-94)

It seems like every week another white man releases a full Bach album, a Bach music video, a Bach re-arrangement. Bach’s music is also a required audition staple of many guitar programs across the globe. What makes him so important? A quick google search of Bach will tell you his is regarded as one of the top composers of all time. It will tell you that he wrote 1128 pieces of music. It will tell you that he wrote about his compositional process in a book which was used to train the following generations of Bachs. Gramophone.uk calls Bach “the supreme arbiter and law-giver of music”.

What mainstream classic music promoters won’t tell you is that other composers like G. P. Telemann actually wrote hundreds more pieces than Bach. Fewer will explain that the compositional style of Bach lent itself to being reused and recycled, and many of his compositions are the exact same with only minor changes and different titles. Even fewer will admit that some of Bach’s writings may not even be his own, and allegedly belong to his wife Anna. His relationship to guitar is nonexistent, completely imagined and fabricated.

Bach never even wrote a piece for guitar, because guitar in its modern form did not quite exist yet. Every Bach piece on the guitar is an arrangement, even the famous so-called “Lute Suites”, now a staple of every guitar undergraduate’s repertoire. Why do we even call them lute suites? They were not written for lute. At best they were written for a “lute-sounding harpsichord”, of which there are no surviving copies or illustrations. Think of it this way, if I am a guitarist and I purchase a harp-guitar, is it because I hope a cult of future harpists will make me their pedagogical genius? No! It’s just a cool guitar. Do all keytar composers secretly yearn for a guitarist’s recognition? Do organists dream of having their music played by a flute choir? The point is, it’s a stretch to call a collection of organ music a “flute suite”, and it is a stretch to call funky keyboard music a “lute suite”.

People like to say that until Bach’s revival by Mendelssohn in 1840, Bach was almost completely forgotten about. This is also untrue, and there are many complimentary references to Bach by other famous composers like Beethoven. But everyone loves an underdog, and everyone likes to feel like they are harboring secret genius inside. That’s why so many white men record his music, because an irrational patriarchy will seek an irrational, musical “golden boy”, just like the Nazis touted Wagner in WW2.

So many classical guitarists are playing Bach now, that it almost seems we have split into many different Bach factions. We have several schools of thought run by the top classical guitarists of our time, and all of them have intricate, deep-seated beliefs about how to play Bach. Yet we have very few facts to back up these styles of playing. If you play music by Bach for an audition, competition, or concert though, you better be prepared for backlash. Play with too much or too little tempo variation, dynamic contrast, articulation, tone color, with or without nails, rest stroke or free stroke, cross-string trills, you will inadvertently offend some college professor or competition judge. This in-group/out-group mentality creates the perfect narcissistic perch, where one can be too lazy to seriously embark on the path of historical performance, but still turn up their nose and act superior towards those who are not in their “in-group”.

Competition Culture

“Audiences do not attend concerts to compare previous performances with
the current one. In many ways, a concert resembles many aspects of a love
relationship: it is the unique attractiveness of your artistic message and
personality that will make you successful. Audiences are, in this context,
“promiscuous”; they have an unlimited capacity to “fall in love” with all
possible unique artistic messages and personalities.

The old truism still applies: you are only competing with yourself.

We should alter our motto from, “today, here, now”, to:

“Me, today, here, now.”” – Ricardo Iznaola, On Practicing (1994)

Iznaola’s books are something I read and reread every few months. We can all use reminders like this in our daily lives, and few technique books for guitar discuss mindset so in-depth and in plain, clear language. However, as this was written 27 years ago, this quote should be taken with a grain of salt. If artists are not striving to make unique and distinct artistic messages/personalities, will audiences still have an unlimited capacity with which to “fall in love” with them? Is playing the Bach Chaconne 20 different ways unique?

Competitions have a lot to be criticized for, although they do serve a real purpose. Some people (especially children) have a hard time getting high-stakes performances elsewhere. Competitions can show you what’s trending in the guitar world near you and beyond. The problem with music performance competitions is that music is not entirely based in facts and so there cannot be a clear winner. This is not to say there are no musical experts, but at some point we’re all at the same level. Nearly every Guitar Foundation of America competition semi-finalist is at the same level of technique and musical interpretation. Guitarists these days pretend like we live in The Queen’s Gambit‘s universe, where there are chess grandmasters who have clearly defeated every other competitor to come there way. In chess there is checkmate, one person wins and one person loses. This is not what music is about at all.

Competitions, much like college auditions, also have a profound affect on the repertoire of a generation. If you want to succeed, you must play the music they suggest. I previously mentioned how divisive playing Bach can be, but what if you choose to play your own composition, arrangement, or just a rare piece you found? Then a judge must choose between a perfect performance of a song they know, versus a perfect performance of a song they don’t know. If the judge takes a risk by highly rating a performance of something they do not know, then they are opening themselves to possible criticism later. So they will more often choose to highly rate what is easiest for them. Judges also subconsciously rate students on things that do not have to do with music, like their gender, age, appearance, relationship status, instrument or choice of music. A lot of times the person who wins a competition is simply a person who frequents that competition. Also, the more people win a competition, the less valuable having won becomes. It’s better to be the first GFA winner than the 50th. Many times rich students from a wealthy state/country will purchase bougie plane tickets to compete with less fortunate guitarists who have few resources available. Many times 35 year old professionals with a full on career and management team compete with 18 year old college freshmen. The list of problems goes on and on.

Competitions encourage an unhealthy attitude towards music. There is no one great master of any style or genre of guitar. We should not all be playing the same music to pit guitarists against one another, we should not be judging other guitarists for missing a note here or there. Competitions encourage a course of music study that is performance-centered, and contains little-to-no music theory, music history, arranging, composition and so forth. They encourage an attitude that is black and white. New music and informed historical performance have been pushed to the side, in favor of the new mainstream: laymen interpretations of expert standards. The whole core message behind the old greats of music history is that it is exciting to be on the cutting edge of music, to boldly go where no one has gone, play what no one else has played. To become the Johann or Anna Bach of your own time, or to create and fall in love with a beautiful piece of music, or share a story that has yet to be shared. That’s what music is all about!

Conclusion: we may be doomed

Competition Culture and Bach Worship are both strangling classical guitar and classical music. Together these attitudes have created and pervaded cultures across the world that are just plain wrong. In some ways it’s a feedback loop: competitions get a steady stream of participants to label “losers” or “winners”, and teachers/students get a taste of some prestige and confirmation bias. But what is the cost? Guitarists everywhere are being taught that winning a competition can bring you success in your career, yet in almost every way today’s competitor mindset is in exact opposition to Iznaola’s ideal artist mindset. If we all play the same pieces, there will simply be less artist voices to “fall in love” with.

An old professor once told me that “critique without action or answer is just lazy intellectualism”. So here’s my answers. First, stop playing Bach. If we stop playing Bach 2 things will happen: Patrons will increase payment for the performance of Bach music because supply of it will shrink as demand stays the same for a while. Then, people will play other things. Music is a like body, it takes up space. We must make room for the next great guitar pieces. Second, competition rules must change. Competitions should create a “banned composers” list, just like how video game and card game competitions ban certain cards or characters that become overplayed during the tournaments. Competitions should accept a larger diversity of repertoire and types of guitar, and introduce stricter limits on the ages and experience levels of the competitors they accept. There should be more competitions that are created by underrepresented groups of composers. The solutions are simple, but they stand in direct opposition to some of the classical guitar/music greats who directly benefit from these problems. Creating change begins with talking about the problems.

The Best Live Music Option for Small Businesses during Covid-19

It’s no secret that musicians and small businesses have taken a massive financial hit due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Large gatherings have been banned across the country, and as a result, concert tours of internationally renowned bands ranging from the Foo Fighters to Imagine Dragons have been cancelled. Many small businesses either must operate remotely, reduce their indoor human capacity, or utilize a delivery service. Without live music, businesses lose customers and support, and without businesses, musicians lose jobs and community engagement. But one type of musician is still thriving, and may be the best and only option for live music during the pandemic: Classical Guitarists!

Classical Guitar is a type of guitar many people have never heard of, but it is extraordinarily versatile. Classical guitar is different from the “classic rock” of AC/DC or Huey Lewis and The News, and it can also be different from “classical music” such as the music of Bach, Mozart, or Beethoven. A “classical guitar” is a just guitar with nylon strings, that’s it! Think of a solo piano song or cover, that is what a lot of classical guitar music sounds like. Here are a few reasons you should hire a classical guitarist for your small business or event:

  1. Classical guitarists can play virtually any type of music! Most of us are used to seeing guitarists strum chords and sing along, or playing a guitar solo/melody. But the classical guitarist can do both at the same time. This eliminates the need for singers or a band. The classical guitarist is a one-man-band with genres like country, blues, classical, pop, rock, etc., all included. Sometimes, you can even make a special song request! Just make sure to ask your guitarist well in advance.

2. Classical guitarists are Covid-19 friendly! Without band mates or singers, the guitarist can rehearse by him/herself. This negates the spread of the Coronavirus via rehearsals, and in performance. No singing means no aerosols, and a single one-man-band means less temptation to shake hands and hug each other, or to linger and drink/smoke like a band might after a rambunctious bar gig! Some venues worry that great music might attract a crowd, particularly in an outdoor area where there is no assigned seating. I believe any outside vendor can attract an equally sized crowd, but crowds can be prevented with signs like “Keep Walking, Don’t Gather, Thanks for Listening!” or with spaced seating. Your customers will greatly appreciate even a tiny morsel of free music as they walk by, and with lifted spirits they will eagerly spend more money shopping!

3. Classical Guitarists are efficient and cost-friendly. A classical guitarist will fit any stage, and they will fit neatly in most small businesses without a stage. More space-efficient live music means more space for money-making customers! Classical guitarists also can play without electricity, they are quite loud and without large crowds there is no need for amplification. Without all the band mates and heavy equipment, costs for a classical guitarist can be as little as $50 per hour, especially if the guitarist lives nearby. Classical guitarists are small business owners too, so it is possible you could negotiate even better deals with them personally!

Again, the music industry as a whole is taking a big financial hit. However, music is an always-changing, fluid thing. Maybe the music industry (as it has existed for the last decade) is not meant to exist for centuries. Like re-emerging plant growth after a forest fire, classical guitarists too now rise from the ashes of corporate music, to bring life to small, local business.

Children Should (almost) Never Play Guitar

Teaching children to play the guitar can be extremely challenging, even in the optimal conditions. Students who are about 10 years old and younger often have a smaller attention span, a smaller arm-span, and a lack of finger dexterity. Sometimes, teaching young students can feel like an uphill battle!

This is why I propose that most students in this age group (10 years or younger) should not play guitar, instead they should play the ukulele. The ukulele provides many advantages for a child in music lessons, and I believe it can still provide an equally rigorous and enjoyable education. Here are some key points to discuss with parents of a new student, who are looking to purchase a guitar for their child.

1. Parents almost always purchase a guitar that is too big for their child. A 6 foot tall man will easily fit a full size guitar, but a “dreadnought” sized guitar is a jumbo guitar! Too big for many adults. A smaller adult (around 5 ft tall) will often fit a smaller guitar better (620-640mm). A ten year old child will need at least 3/4 size guitar, and a 5 year old will probably need a 1/2 size guitar. Often times music shops will sell guitars that are too big to children on purpose. Getting a guitar that is too big for a child can ruin music for them forever! It makes them feel like they are inadequate, or stupid, and can cause injuries. Even when they follow all the directions correctly, the big guitar doesn’t work. The young student says to themselves, “It must be my fault, there is something wrong with me”, but it is only the guitar’s fault. This is one of the biggest tragedies of guitar teaching; getting the wrong size guitar for a student is a dream-killer. Soprano ukuleles are all basically the same size, and will fit any size person.

2. Guitars are expensive. An awful, cheap guitar will cost you slightly less than $100. A few students have parents that want their child to start a life-long journey of classical guitar, and so they will invest hundreds of dollars into a high-quality miniature-guitar. Most parents don’t have that kind of money, or don’t know what classical guitar is. My personal ukulele that I use in concert is $25. So if you’re a parent who is testing the waters with new lessons, consider purchasing a $25 ukulele instead of a $100+ guitar. Saving that money early on can help you invest in a great guitar for a future birthday!

3. Ukulele is easier to play in many ways. The simplest chords on guitar require 2 left hand fingers to play, but the simplest chords on ukulele only require a single finger. This helps young children who have yet to develop their natural finger dexterity. Having only 4 strings is a great advantage too, because we guitarists hate using our right hand pinky fingers for plucking the strings! That means most of us only pluck with 4 fingers. Having only 4 fingers and 4 strings means every finger has its own “assigned seat”, and the A finger goes on the A string. Children find this extremely intuitive, and it’s a great way to introduce fingerstyle. It’s like bowling with the bumpers up, there’s so much less to worry about. The same is true of playing a small 4 string instrument instead of a giant 6 string instrument!

Ukuleles are more cost effective, and more accessible mentally and physically, especially for kids. So why aren’t we all teaching young students ukulele, and graduating them up to bigger guitars as they get older? 

1.) Ukuleles are not viewed as “serious” instruments like violin and piano. But 100 years ago, before the legacy of Andres Segovia, guitars weren’t taken seriously either.

2. Ukuleles can’t teach you the same songs a guitar can, like the music of Sor, Aguado, and Guiliani. But actually it can! Check out these free pdfs:          https://pdfminstrel.wordpress.com/2-standard-high-g-ukulele-pdfs/

3. You’ll have to unlearn certain techniques. This may be true, you may not be able to hold and play a ukulele exactly like a guitar, but it’s pretty darn close. As you grow from a child into an adult, you will already have to relearn/unlearn many things, even if you only play guitar your whole life. Your body shape changes, and so you must change your playing posture. The way you play the strings may change from ukulele to guitar, but no more or less than the way you play guitar changes from young age to old age. Many professional guitarists never play a stringed instrument until they are 18.

There are always exceptions to the rules. Some young students are exceptionally tall, and some old students are exceptionally short! Some parents and students are extremely passionate about classical guitar, and will go to any length, even building a custom guitar, to ensure their child sticks to playing the guitar. But this is not the average situation. With the average young student, I believe they can learn more and learn faster on a ukulele instead of a guitar. That is why I say children should (almost) never play guitar!